Test updating docker group 1 to test containers - #8960
Conversation
Execution-Time Benchmarks Report ⏱️Execution-time results for samples comparing This PR (8960) and master. ✅ No regressions detected - check the details below Full Metrics ComparisonFakeDbCommand
HttpMessageHandler
Comparison explanationExecution-time benchmarks measure the whole time it takes to execute a program, and are intended to measure the one-off costs. Cases where the execution time results for the PR are worse than latest master results are highlighted in **red**. The following thresholds were used for comparing the execution times:
Note that these results are based on a single point-in-time result for each branch. For full results, see the dashboard. Graphs show the p99 interval based on the mean and StdDev of the test run, as well as the mean value of the run (shown as a diamond below the graph). Duration chartsFakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Framework 4.8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (71ms) : 69, 73
master - mean (72ms) : 69, 75
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (79ms) : 75, 82
master - mean (81ms) : 73, 89
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (1,091ms) : 1042, 1141
master - mean (1,096ms) : 1052, 1141
FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (112ms) : 105, 119
master - mean (115ms) : 108, 121
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (114ms) : 108, 120
master - mean (115ms) : 108, 122
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (785ms) : 761, 810
master - mean (785ms) : 763, 807
FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 6)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (97ms) : 95, 99
master - mean (103ms) : 97, 109
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (98ms) : 96, 100
master - mean (99ms) : 96, 103
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (942ms) : 902, 981
master - mean (950ms) : 901, 999
FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) FakeDbCommand (.NET 8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (100ms) : 95, 106
master - mean (98ms) : 92, 105
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (99ms) : 94, 104
master - mean (102ms) : 96, 108
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (824ms) : 781, 867
master - mean (822ms) : 782, 862
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Framework 4.8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (208ms) : 203, 214
master - mean (211ms) : 205, 217
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (213ms) : 208, 217
master - mean (215ms) : 211, 219
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (1,248ms) : 1198, 1299
master - mean (1,268ms) : 1214, 1321
HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET Core 3.1)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (298ms) : 293, 304
master - mean (303ms) : 294, 312
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (298ms) : 293, 303
master - mean (305ms) : 295, 315
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (995ms) : 979, 1012
master - mean (1,009ms) : 984, 1035
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 6)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (292ms) : 283, 301
master - mean (298ms) : 291, 305
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (292ms) : 286, 298
master - mean (297ms) : 291, 303
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (1,186ms) : 1136, 1235
master - mean (1,200ms) : 1160, 1239
HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)gantt
title Execution time (ms) HttpMessageHandler (.NET 8)
dateFormat x
axisFormat %Q
todayMarker off
section Baseline
This PR (8960) - mean (293ms) : 284, 301
master - mean (300ms) : 294, 306
section Bailout
This PR (8960) - mean (296ms) : 287, 304
master - mean (301ms) : 293, 308
section CallTarget+Inlining+NGEN
This PR (8960) - mean (1,066ms) : 1021, 1111
master - mean (1,094ms) : 989, 1199
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2026-07-31 20:50:18 Comparing candidate commit 4acaa81 in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 2 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 70 metrics, 0 unstable metrics, 61 known flaky benchmarks, 65 flaky benchmarks without significant changes.
|
6e19743 to
8c92584
Compare
Snapshots difference summaryThe following differences have been observed in committed snapshots. It is meant to help the reviewer. 4 occurrences of : - Resource: Hello,
+ Resource: NoOp,
[...]
- couchbase.operation.code: Hello,
- couchbase.operation.key: obfuscated,
+ couchbase.operation.code: NoOp,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
1 occurrences of : + Resource: SaslList,
+ Service: Samples.Couchbase3-couchbase,
+ Type: db,
+ Tags: {
+ component: Couchbase,
+ couchbase.operation.code: SaslList,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
+ db.couchbase.seed.nodes: couchbase,
+ env: integration_tests,
+ language: dotnet,
+ runtime-id: Guid_1,
+ span.kind: client,
+ _dd.base_service: Samples.Couchbase3,
+ _dd.svc_src: couchbase
+ },
+ Metrics: {
+ process_id: 0,
+ _dd.top_level: 1.0,
+ _dd.tracer_kr: 1.0,
+ _sampling_priority_v1: 1.0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ TraceId: Id_21,
+ SpanId: Id_22,
+ Name: couchbase.query,
+ Resource: SaslList,
+ Service: Samples.Couchbase3-couchbase,
+ Type: db,
+ Tags: {
+ component: Couchbase,
+ couchbase.operation.code: SaslList,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
+ db.couchbase.seed.nodes: couchbase,
+ env: integration_tests,
+ language: dotnet,
+ runtime-id: Guid_1,
+ span.kind: client,
+ _dd.base_service: Samples.Couchbase3,
+ _dd.svc_src: couchbase
+ },
+ Metrics: {
+ process_id: 0,
+ _dd.top_level: 1.0,
+ _dd.tracer_kr: 1.0,
+ _sampling_priority_v1: 1.0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ TraceId: Id_23,
+ SpanId: Id_24,
+ Name: couchbase.query,
2 occurrences of : - TraceId: Id_21,
- SpanId: Id_22,
+ TraceId: Id_25,
+ SpanId: Id_26,
2 occurrences of : - TraceId: Id_23,
- SpanId: Id_24,
+ TraceId: Id_27,
+ SpanId: Id_28,
1 occurrences of : + Resource: SaslList,
+ Service: Samples.Couchbase3,
+ Type: db,
+ Tags: {
+ component: Couchbase,
+ couchbase.operation.code: SaslList,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
+ db.couchbase.seed.nodes: couchbase,
+ env: integration_tests,
+ language: dotnet,
+ peer.service: couchbase,
+ runtime-id: Guid_1,
+ span.kind: client,
+ version: 1.0.0,
+ _dd.peer.service.source: db.couchbase.seed.nodes
+ },
+ Metrics: {
+ process_id: 0,
+ _dd.top_level: 1.0,
+ _dd.tracer_kr: 1.0,
+ _sampling_priority_v1: 1.0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ TraceId: Id_21,
+ SpanId: Id_22,
+ Name: couchbase.query,
+ Resource: SaslList,
+ Service: Samples.Couchbase3,
+ Type: db,
+ Tags: {
+ component: Couchbase,
+ couchbase.operation.code: SaslList,
+ couchbase.operation.key: ,
+ db.couchbase.seed.nodes: couchbase,
+ env: integration_tests,
+ language: dotnet,
+ peer.service: couchbase,
+ runtime-id: Guid_1,
+ span.kind: client,
+ version: 1.0.0,
+ _dd.peer.service.source: db.couchbase.seed.nodes
+ },
+ Metrics: {
+ process_id: 0,
+ _dd.top_level: 1.0,
+ _dd.tracer_kr: 1.0,
+ _sampling_priority_v1: 1.0
+ }
+ },
+ {
+ TraceId: Id_23,
+ SpanId: Id_24,
+ Name: couchbase.query,
|
Summary of changes
Swaps docker group 1 to testcontainers
Very WIP at the moment
We are investigating whether this will help with load on the CI VMs
Reason for change
Implementation details
Test coverage
Other details
#incident-57303